FIFA’s consideration to hold the Club World Cup every two years after 2029, as reported by The Guardian, signals a major shift in football’s global competitive structure. While the Federation of International Football Association (FIFA) frames it as a response to climate change and a congested calendar, the proposed move raises significant questions: Is this a strategic evolution for global football or a dangerous gamble that threatens its integrity?
Strategic Context: Market Expansion and Calendar Pressure
FIFA argues that the biennial Club World Cup would better adapt to climate realities and the crowded international match schedule. However, many observers believe there’s a deeper strategic motive, one aimed at rivaling UEFA’s Champions League and expanding FIFA’s commercial footprint, especially in underexploited markets like Asia, North America, and the Middle East.
With the 32-team format debuting in 2025, modeled closely on the FIFA World Cup, this shift could be the start of a long-term campaign to elevate the Club World Cup into a global spectacle and high-yield revenue generator.
Player Welfare: Stretching the Limits
The growing demands on elite footballers continue to spark concern. Players’ unions such as FIFPro have repeatedly warned about the risk of physical and mental burnout due to relentless schedules. Adding a biennial Club World Cup, a competition requiring global travel and extra high-stakes matches, could severely stretch players already operating at their physical limits.
Rather than enhancing football, this frequency could endanger its most important assets: the players themselves.
Commercial Interests vs Sporting Integrity
One of the most controversial aspects of the proposal is the perceived over-commercialization of football. Critics argue that FIFA’s push to dominate club competitions reflects a profit-driven agenda rather than a commitment to the sport’s core values. This shift could diminish the meaning and exclusivity of the tournament. When every year or two hosts a “global showdown,” the spectacle risks losing its allure. It also blurs the traditional distinction between club and international football calendars, creating tension with domestic leagues and confederations.
Geopolitical and Climate Considerations
FIFA President Gianni Infantino has cited climate concerns, including dangerously high temperatures in potential host nations, as a reason for calendar flexibility. This is not unfounded; extreme weather has already affected tournament scheduling, with the 2022 Qatar World Cup shifted to winter. However, critics argue that using climate as a justification for a biennial competition feels more like narrative convenience than a comprehensive climate strategy. Hosting more frequent global events also raises questions about sustainability, carbon footprints, and resource allocation.
Stakeholder Reactions: Division and Dissent
Across global football, the reception to FIFA’s ambitions remains mixed. European clubs, whose players would bear the brunt of this expansion, are largely opposed, citing calendar congestion, travel fatigue, and potential disruptions to domestic and continental competitions.
On the other hand, clubs from developing football regions, such as Asia and Africa, may welcome increased visibility and financial incentives. Yet, whether that benefit translates into long-term development is still unclear.
Mismatch of Quality and Competitive Imbalance
One of the most glaring issues plaguing the current format, and one likely to persist under a biennial model, is the huge disparity in team quality. In the 2023 edition, for example, German giants Bayern Munich demolished Auckland City FC 10-0, a team from Australia, whose squad featured part-time footballers. While the underdogs saw it as a dream to share the pitch with football idols, the mismatch embarrassed the tournament’s competitive credibility.
When such lopsided results become the norm, it undermines the very purpose of the competition. Football thrives on drama, uncertainty, and rivalry, not foregone conclusions.
Low Fan Turnout and Declining Public Enthusiasm
Despite FIFA’s global branding, the last Club World Cup saw poor stadium attendance. Matches involving high-profile clubs still struggled to attract fans, pointing to a fundamental disconnect between FIFA’s ambition and fan engagement. Whether due to location, ticket pricing, or lack of prestige, the tournament failed to generate the excitement expected of a “world championship.”
This lack of energy and visibility damages the tournament’s image and raises the question: Is FIFA building a product fans genuinely want, or one it hopes to sell regardless of demand?
Negative Publicity and Media Backlash
The Club World Cup’s recent editions have attracted negative press over format, timing, and commercial motives. Media coverage has questioned the legitimacy of the tournament’s expansion and accused FIFA of prioritizing financial returns over the sport’s long-term welfare. The backlash has been especially fierce in Europe, where football journalists and analysts warn that the growing FIFA calendar is increasingly tone-deaf to grassroots realities, domestic schedules, and club-level operations.
Conclusion: A Crossroads for Global Football
FIFA’s push for a biennial Club World Cup post-2029 embodies a high-stakes power shift. While there are legitimate concerns about climate and visibility for non-European clubs, the expansion risks commodifying football even further, alienating players, federations, and fans. The critical question remains is FIFA reforming football for the better or just building a bigger cash machine?
It’s time for clubs, fans, players, and national federations to speak up. Football’s future should be shaped by those who live it, not just those who profit from it. FIFA must listen, adapt, and prioritize the game’s integrity over commercial ambition.
Leave feedback about this