By Kazeem Ajibola Shoyebo
Former Super Eagles captain John Obi Mikel has launched a scathing critique of Arsenal, questioning the team’s creativity, leadership, and direction under manager Mikel Arteta amid growing concerns over their recent performances.
Mikel Obi’s comments come at a time when Arsenal’s form has come under scrutiny following inconsistent displays, including a recent league setback that has intensified pressure in the title race. ([The Guardian][1])
Speaking in a widely circulated interview, the former Chelsea midfielder claimed the Gunners have become predictable and lack players willing to take responsibility in decisive moments.
“They look like a team that has run out of ideas. They have no clue,” Mikel said.
He further criticized the absence of leadership on the pitch, suggesting no player is stepping up to influence games or inspire the team when it matters most.
“When you watch this Arsenal side, there’s nobody willing to take responsibility… nobody willing to be that guy who says, ‘I’m going to create chances.’”
Mikel also pointed to what he believes is a deeper tactical issue, arguing that Arteta’s system has limited the players’ natural attacking instincts and creativity.
“I think Arteta has coached the flair out of them. When they go on the pitch now, they don’t know how to express their quality because they feel the manager isn’t letting them.”
The criticism echoes a broader narrative emerging around Arsenal’s recent struggles, with pundits and analysts questioning whether the team has become too rigid in its approach during a crucial phase of the season.
Describing their style as “static, boring, and even pathetic to watch,” Mikel emphasized the need for both motivation and freedom, insisting those elements are key to unlocking the squad’s potential.
“Motivation and freedom are the keys.”
Despite the criticism, Arsenal remain in contention for their season objectives, but the remarks from a high-profile former player highlight growing external pressure on Arteta to rediscover balance between structure and attacking expression as the campaign enters its decisive stretch.