June 25, 2026
News

FIFA Rejects South Africa Appeal as Zwane Ban Stands; Paraguay Challenges FIFA Over Bellingham Incident

Bafana Bafana Suffer Major Blow Ahead of Canada Clash While Paraguay Questions Consistency of New World Cup Rule

Two separate disciplinary controversies have emerged at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, with South Africa losing a crucial appeal over captain Themba Zwane’s suspension and Paraguay formally challenging FIFA’s handling of an incident involving England star Jude Bellingham.

SOUTH AFRICA’S APPEAL REJECTED

South Africa’s preparations for their historic Round of 32 clash against co-hosts Canada have suffered a significant setback after FIFA rejected the South African Football Association’s appeal against Themba Zwane’s three-match suspension.

The decision means the experienced midfielder and captain will remain unavailable for Sunday’s knockout match despite Bafana Bafana’s efforts to have the sanction reduced. FIFA’s ruling leaves head coach Hugo Broos without one of his most influential players as South Africa prepares for the first knockout-stage match in the nation’s World Cup history.

According to reports, Zwane was handed the suspension following a disciplinary incident during South Africa’s opening group-stage match. SAFA argued that the punishment was excessive and sought to overturn or reduce the sanction, but FIFA’s disciplinary authorities upheld the original ruling.

The ruling comes just days after South Africa secured a historic 1-0 victory over South Korea to reach the World Cup knockout rounds for the first time ever. While Bafana Bafana have become one of the tournament’s surprise success stories, they will now face Canada without one of the leaders who helped guide them to this milestone.

PARAGUAY FILES FORMAL COMPLAINT OVER BELLINGHAM

In a separate development, the Paraguayan Football Federation (APF) has submitted a formal complaint to FIFA regarding Jude Bellingham’s conduct during England’s goalless draw against Ghana.

The protest centers on television footage showing Bellingham covering his mouth while speaking with Ghana captain Jordan Ayew during the match. Paraguay argues that the incident should have been investigated under FIFA’s newly introduced mouth-covering regulations.

The APF’s complaint follows the controversial dismissal of Paraguay star Miguel Almirón, who became the first player sent off under FIFA’s new rule during Paraguay’s match against Türkiye. Almirón received a red card after covering his mouth during a confrontation with an opponent, following a VAR review.

Paraguay’s position is that FIFA has not applied the regulation consistently. Officials from the federation believe similarities exist between the two incidents and have asked FIFA to clarify why disciplinary action was taken against Almirón but not against Bellingham.

However, FIFA’s current interpretation of the rule appears to support the decision not to punish the England midfielder. Refereeing chief Pierluigi Collina previously explained that the act of covering one’s mouth is not automatically punishable. Instead, sanctions are intended for situations involving confrontations, arguments or suspected abusive conduct.

Multiple reports indicate that officials determined Bellingham’s interaction with Ayew did not constitute a confrontation and appeared to be a routine conversation between players. Neither the referee nor VAR deemed the exchange worthy of disciplinary action during or after the match.

DISCIPLINARY DEBATES CONTINUE TO GROW

The two cases have added to growing discussion surrounding FIFA’s disciplinary framework at the expanded 2026 World Cup.

For South Africa, the immediate concern is replacing a key leader ahead of a historic knockout encounter with Canada.

For Paraguay, the focus remains on obtaining clarity regarding a regulation that has already generated significant controversy after producing the tournament’s first red card for mouth-covering conduct.

Whether FIFA responds formally to Paraguay’s complaint remains to be seen. What is certain is that disciplinary decisions are becoming almost as heavily scrutinized as the football itself as the World Cup enters its knockout phase.

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field