By Paul Lucky Okoku
Former Super Eagles International
Vice-Captain, Flying Eagles Class of 1983
-
As Nigeria challenges DR Congo’s eligibility decisions, FIFA’s verdict could redefine fair play, national law, and the Super Eagles’ path back to the global stage.
Nigeria’s football heartbeat raced again this week with news that the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has formally petitioned FIFA over the eligibility of players fielded by the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) in the decisive 2026 World Cup qualifying playoff — a match the Super Eagles lost on penalties after a 1–1 draw.
This development stirred memories of an earlier controversy when Nigeria protested a similar situation involving South Africa — and won three points back when Bafana Bafana were penalized for an ineligible player. While that deduction didn’t alter South Africa’s ultimate qualification for the 2026 World Cup (they were already ahead on the standings), it underscored an unshakeable truth in football: rules are not optional — they must be honoured.
The Heart of the Petition
At the centre of Nigeria’s protest is the assertion that several DR Congo internationals were not properly cleared under their own national law before representing the Leopards — even though FIFA had previously approved them based on documentation, including Congolese passports.
Here’s the key issue:
• DR Congo’s constitution does not recognise dual citizenship, meaning individuals who obtain another nationality are expected to renounce their original one, especially after they turn 21.
• The NFF claims that at least six to nine players fielded by DR Congo — many of whom hold European passports (French, Dutch, English, etc.) — did not formally renounce their prior nationalities before playing in the playoff.
• Aaron Wan-Bissaka, the England-born defender who opted to represent DR Congo, has been singled out publicly among those whose eligibility is under scrutiny, as he still holds a European passport.
According to NFF officials, this constitutes a breach of Congolese national law, meaning those players were, in Nigeria’s eyes, ineligible despite being cleared by FIFA.
DR Congo, predictably, has dismissed the petition, calling it sour-loser rhetoric and defending its victory on the pitch.
What FIFA Rules Say — And What They Don’t
FIFA’s eligibility framework focuses first on holding a permanent nationality that is not dependent on residence. Under the Regulations Governing the Application of the FIFA Statutes (Articles 15–18), a player who holds a nation’s passport and meets connection criteria — such as birth, descent, or residence — can represent that nation.
Importantly:
• FIFA does not police domestic nationality laws — it relies on national associations to confirm that a player’s passport reflects true nationality status and compliance with their own country’s rules.
• That means a player cleared by FIFA on the basis of a valid Congolese passport is eligible under FIFA regulations — unless it’s shown that the documentation was fraudulent or incomplete.
So Nigeria’s argument hinges not on FIFA’s own statutes — which generally allow a player to represent a country if they legitimately hold its nationality — but on the claim that Congolese law was violated in the naturalisation process and that information submitted to FIFA was misleading.
This moment also demands recognition where it is unequivocally due. The President of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF), Alhaji Ibrahim Musa Gusau, and his officials deserve the highest respect for their clear command of CAF and FIFA rules, policies, guidelines, and the governance framework of world football. This is not opportunism; it is informed leadership. Nigeria has successfully navigated this terrain before — most notably when CAF ruled in Nigeria’s favor against South Africa for fielding an ineligible player. That victory was not accidental. It was the result of administrators who understand that modern football is governed as much by statutes and compliance as by skill and tactics. Now, with FIFA seized of the petition against DR Congo, Alhaji Ibrahim Musa Gusau’s leadership once again places Nigeria in a position of credibility and strength. Regardless of the final outcome, the NFF has demonstrated institutional maturity and diligence that deserve special recognition — bar none.
Why This Matters
If FIFA finds that DR Congo did indeed field ineligible players — because their nationality status violated either FIFA’s interpretation of nationality or the documentation was flawed — the results could be dramatic:
• The match may be forfeited, which could see Nigeria reinstated into the African qualifying picture.
• A full expulsion of DR Congo from the intercontinental playoff is less likely, but cannot be entirely ruled out if FIFA deems the breaches significant.
This is no mere technicality. FIFA regulations exist not just to police paperwork, but to protect the integrity of competition everywhere. When rules are respected universally, teams win or lose because of performance — not legal ambiguity.
Where Nigeria Could Go Next
If FIFA rules in Nigeria’s favour — or if DR Congo is penalized to the point that they’re removed from the intercontinental play-off bracket — the Super Eagles could find themselves back in contention.
As of now, the World Cup intercontinental playoffs (to be held in Mexico in March 2026) involve six nations fighting for two final spots in the 2026 World Cup in the United States, Mexico, and Canada. DR Congo — seed in Pathway 1 — is set to face the winner between Jamaica and New Caledonia in the final of its bracket.
The other bracket pits Bolivia, Suriname, and Iraq against one another for another coveted World Cup ticket.
Imagine this: if Nigeria is reinstated and placed into that Pathway, the Super Eagles could once again chase global qualification — a chance many had thought extinguished.
Legacy and Opportunity
Truth be told, football is decided on the pitch — that’s the magic, the unpredictability, the pure human drama that makes the World Cup football’s greatest stage. No amount of legal wrangling can change that. But when administrative and eligibility rules are broken, justice demands scrutiny.
Nigeria’s petition isn’t merely about reversing a result. It’s about insisting that every team earns its place within the framework that governs the game. Whether or not Nigeria goes to Mexico and beyond in March, this moment reaffirms a fundamental principle: football is a game of passion and rules, and both must be respected without exception.
For the Super Eagles and their supporters, the story may yet have another chapter before the March qualifiers are played.
Football justice, eligibility rules, and World Cup dreams collide as Nigeria waits on FIFA’s judgment.
By Paul Lucky Okoku
Former Super Eagles International
Vice-Captain, Flying Eagles Class of 1983
Reflections, In My Own Words — Championing Fairness, One Story at a Time. ✍️
Leave feedback about this